How People Accept Second Hand Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

How People Accept Second Hand - Essay ExampleRobinson laments that schools stifle creativity by undervaluing mistakes and promoting certain intellectual norms. Lightman wants people to dwell being lazy in consuming second-hand in stressation, because this is a medieval way of learning, and to start becoming active and creative producers of primary information, which can be the solitary(prenominal) true source of knowledge. People lazily consume second-hand information and treat them usually as knowledge often automatically and blindly, as if by faith. Scientists and educators carry to go out and test their theories, but people in general, sit back, receive information, and rarely test the latters veracity. Lightman asks if people have personally verified (17) if the creation is flat or round. He discounts the existence of the globe and Apollo pictures as proof that the earth is round (17). These are not enough evidence that the world is round, because psyche else has made them o r collected them, and this does not mean that their proof is immediately true. Lightman does not withal hold what geodesists say as true, though their whole employment may lie on understanding the detailed shape of the earth (17). Lightman does not easily believe them, because they have their own measurements, which may be misemploy too. ... Ariely investigates why people seldom change what they do and how they think. He conducts several experiments and comes up with his theory, the personal fudge factor, where people lease a certain form of irrationality, which they believe is enough to help them still believe that they are correct. The problem with the personal fudge factor is that people no longer test their intuitions, says Ariely. creation incorrect to some degree may be enough to make an intuition entirely incorrect. When people just accept intuitions and never test them, that is theater of operations laziness. That laziness, nevertheless, sacrifices the pursuit and atta inment of tested information that may be the only basis for correct information. This laziness brings people back to the medieval-period approach to learning, when the masses accept what people in power say is right. Philosophers once dominated the production of knowledge because of their influence, but the problem with them is that they rarely apply the scientific method in their practice (Lightman 19). As a result, they have theoretical conceptions on the shape of the earth. People then believed for centuries that the earth was flat without even testing its validity. People in power also use history to tell their own versions of the story. For instance, it is only until recently that people learn how Columbus and other European settlers in the Americas had killed millions of native Americans, because of the formers colonization goals. Before, people live in comfortable knowledge that the European invaders brought civilization to the native heathens. The same promotion of ignorance can be said with schools. Schools had also